Spradlin v. Drennen Cadillac Company, Inc.

Supreme Court of Alabama April 11, 1991

Spradlin v. Drennen Cadillac Company, Inc., 578 So. 2d 1251 (Ala. 1991)

1991 WL 82151; 1991 Ala. LEXIS 424

Hornsby, Almon, Adams, Steagall, Ingram

Opinion of the Court

ON REHEARING EX MERO MOTU

PER CURIAM.

The opinion of April 5, 1991, is withdrawn and the following is substituted therefor:

This appeal is dismissed because the appellant has failed to submit an argument that contains the “contentions of the appellant with respect to the issues presented, and the reasons therefor, with citations to the authorities, statutes, and parts of the record relied on.” See A.R.App.P. 28(a)(5) and Stephens v. Lindsey, 542 So.2d 278 (Ala. 1989).

ORIGINAL OPINION WITHDRAWN; OPINION SUBSTITUTED; DISMISSED.

HORNSBY, C.J., and ALMON, ADAMS, STEAGALL and INGRAM, JJ., concur.

Reference

Full Case Name: M.A. Spradlin v. Drennen Cadillac Company, Inc., and Amerisure Insurance Company.
Cited By: 1 case
Status: Published