Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Supreme Court of Alabama, 1991

Taylor v. Segraves

Taylor v. Segraves
Supreme Court of Alabama · Decided May 10, 1991 · Steagall, Maddox, Almon, Shores, Adams, Houston, Kennedy, Ingram
582 So. 2d 464; 1991 Ala. LEXIS 343; 1991 WL 90762 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Taylor v. Segraves

Opinion of the Court

STEAGALL, Justice.

Johnny Taylor appeals from the summary judgment in favor of Phil Segraves in his suit against Segraves, Bill Rayburn, and Golden Rule Insurance Company based on an alleged fraud and negligent failure to procure insurance.1 This Court affirmed the rescission of the insurance contract (which Golden Rule had sought in its counterclaim against Taylor) in Taylor v. Golden Rule Insurance Co., 544 So.2d 932 (Ala. 1989). We find that the judgment for Seg-raves is due to be affirmed on the authority of that case.

AFFIRMED.

MADDOX, ALMON, SHORES, ADAMS, HOUSTON, KENNEDY and INGRAM, JJ., concur.

. A summary judgment was entered for Bill Rayburn on July 29, 1987, but that judgment is not at issue in this appeal.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑