State Highway Department v. Dyess Outdoor Advertising, Inc.
Cases that cite this one
1 later published case cites this decision.
- Lamar Advertising v. State Dot. (Ala. 1996)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
The trial court’s summary judgment in favor of Dyess Outdoor Advertising is due to be reversed on the authority of State Highway Department v. Headrick Outdoor Advertising, Inc., 594 So.2d 1202 (Ala. 1992).
Accordingly, we reverse the judgment and remand this case for a determination of whether the billboards in question were erected and are being maintained illegally and must, therefore, be removed; and if so, for a determination of whether Dyess Outdoor Advertising is entitled to just compensation for the removal of the signs from the State Highway Department and, if so, what amount would justly compensate Dyess for their removal.
REVERSED AND REMANDED.
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.