Kelly v. Ellis
Kelly v. Ellis
Opinion of the Court
That portion of the judgment in favor of the City of Birmingham, based on a directed verdict, is affirmed on the authority of 42 U.S.C. § 1983; City of St. Louis v. Praprotnik, 485 U.S. 112, 108 S.Ct. 915, 99 L.Ed.2d 107 (1988); Pembaur v. City of Cincinnati, 475 U.S. 469, 106 S.Ct. 1292, 89 L.Ed.2d 452 (1986); Monell v. Depart
That portion of the judgment in favor of the defendants Arthur W. Ellis and Faye Lampkin Mitchell, based on a jury verdict, is affirmed on the authority of Alpine Bay Resorts, Inc. v. Wyatt, 539 So.2d 160 (Ala. 1988); G.M. Mosley Contractors, Inc. v. Phillips, 487 So.2d 876 (Ala. 1986); and White v. Fridge, 461 So.2d 793 (Ala. 1984). See also Campbell v. Burns, 512 So.2d 1341 (Ala. 1987); Ashbee v. Brock, 510 So.2d 214 (Ala. 1987); Hollis v. Wyrosdick, 508 So.2d 704 (Ala. 1987); Jawad v. Gra-nade, 497 So.2d 471 (Ala. 1986); Willingham v. State, 261 Ala. 454, 74 So.2d 241 (1954); Charles W. Gamble, McElroy’s Alabama Evidence § 121.07 (4th ed. 1991); and Rules 54(c) and 55, A.R.Civ.P.
AFFIRMED.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Patrick D. KELLY v. Arthur W. ELLIS
- Cited By
- 1 case
- Status
- Published