Thomas v. State
Supreme Court of Alabama
Thomas v. State, 616 So. 2d 352 (Ala. 1992)
1992 Ala. LEXIS 744; 1992 WL 180735
Adams, Hornsby, Shores, Houston, Ingram
Thomas v. State
Opinion of the Court
In light of the prosecution’s misrepresentations regarding the lost evidence, we conclude that the denial of the defendant’s motion to set aside his guilty plea constituted a manifest injustice. See Rule 14.4(e), Alabama Rules of Criminal Procedure. The judgment of the Court of Criminal Appeals is hereby reversed and the case is remanded with instructions that the defendant be allowed to withdraw his guilty plea.
REVERSED AND REMANDED.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Ex Parte Lee Arthur Thomas. (Re Lee Arthur Thomas v. State).
- Cited By
- 4 cases
- Status
- Published