Tanner v. Alabama Power Company
Cases that cite this one
32 later published cases cite this decision. The 25 that cite it most often are listed here.
- James v. Alabama Coalition for Equity, Inc. (Ala. 1997)
- State v. Brantley Land, LLC (Ala. 2007)
- Stokes v. Cottrell (Ala. 2010)
- Alfa Mutual Insurance v. Bone (Ala. 2009)
- Goldome Credit Corp. v. Player (Ala. Civ. App. 2003)
- Haynes v. Alfa Financial Corp. (Ala. 1999)
- William M. Pickard v. American Pride Properties, LLC (Appeal from Jefferson Circuit Court: CV-21-903550). (Ala. 2024)
- James R. Davis v. American Pride Properties, LLC (Appeal from Jefferson Circuit Court: CV-21-903550). (Ala. 2024)
- Bessie Kirksey v. Iris Johnson (Ala. 2014)
- Williams v. Williams (Ala. Civ. App. 2014)
- Alabama Department of Corrections v. Merritt (Ala. Civ. App. 2010)
- Martin v. Phillips (Ala. Civ. App. 2008)
- Underwriters at Lloyd's v. So. Natural Gas (Ala. 2006)
- Traveka Stanley, Reginald Burrell, Charlie Gray, Jermaine Pringle, and Ranquel Smith v. Kay Ivey, Governor of Alabama, and John Hamm, Commissioner of the Alabama Department of Corrections, in their official capacities (Ala. 2025)
- Blose v. Balentine (Ala. Civ. App. 2017)
- Blose v. Balentine (Ala. Civ. App. 2017)
- Crouch v. North Alabama Sand & Gravel, LLC (Ala. 2015)
- Moseley v. Cook (Ala. 2014)
- Austin v. Austin (Ala. Civ. App. 2012)
- Pynes v. Jackson Hospital (Ala. 2012)
- Ex Parte Alabama Department of Corrections, 1100129 (Ala. 5-13-2011) (Ala. 2011)
- Banyan Corp. v. Leithead (Ala. 2009)
- Cochran v. Chapman (Ala. Civ. App. 2008)
- SCI ALABAMA FUNERAL SERVICES v. Hester (Ala. Civ. App. 2007)
- Hood v. Wilson (Ala. Civ. App. 2006)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
Our opinion of August 9, 1991, is withdrawn and the following is substituted therefor.
Charles and Shirley Tanner appealed from an order of the Jefferson County Circuit Court granting an application of Alabama Power Company ("APCo") for condemnation of a right-of-way over the Tanners' property. The trial judge, before determining the amount of damages, entered an order purporting to certify the order as a "final judgment" pursuant to Ala.R.Civ.P. 54(b). The dispositive issue before us is whether Rule 54(b) allows the circuit court to certify as final its order granting a public utility's application for condemnation while expressly retaining jurisdiction to determine the amount of compensation to be awarded to the landowner. We hold that it does not.
Rule 54(b), in pertinent part, states:
"When more than one claim for relief is presented in an action, whether as a claim, counterclaim, cross-claim, or third-party claim, or when multiple parties are involved, the court may direct the entry of a final judgment as to one or more but fewer than all of the claims or parties only upon an express determination that there is no just reason for delay and upon an express direction for the entry of judgment."
(Emphasis added.) The sine qua non of the rule's applicability is the existence of multiple parties or claims. The rule confers appellate jurisdiction over an order of judgment only where the trial court "has completely disposed of one of a number of claims, or one of multiple parties." Rule 54(b), committee comments (emphasis added). In other words, the "trial court cannot *Page 657
confer appellate jurisdiction upon this court through directing entry of judgment under Rule 54(b) if the judgment is not otherwise 'final.' " Robinson v. Computer Servicenters, Inc.,
In this case, the trial court, in granting APCo's application for condemnation without adjudicating the issue of damages, failed to "completely dispose" of APCo's claim. See committee comments to Rule 54(b); see also Liberty Mutual Ins. Co. v.Wetzel,
In McGowin, as in this case, landowners, prior to an adjudication of the issue of damages, appealed from an order granting an application for condemnation. In dismissing the appeal, this Court noted that it had "been unable to find any Alabama condemnation case in which an appeal was allowed prior to assessment of damages."
The reasoning of McGowin is equally applicable in this case. To put it simply, the trial court's attempted Rule 54(b) certification was ineffective to transform its condemnation order into a final judgment. Consequently, we are compelled to dismiss the appeals as premature. Powell v. Republic Nat'l LifeIns. Co.,
ORIGINAL OPINION WITHDRAWN; OPINION SUBSTITUTED; APPEALS DISMISSED.
HORNSBY, C.J., and ALMON, STEAGALL and INGRAM, JJ., concur.
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.