Blackburn v. Resolution Trust Corp.
Blackburn v. Resolution Trust Corp.
Opinion of the Court
This Court has this day held that §
QUESTION DECLINED.
ALMON, SHORES, KENNEDY and INGRAM, JJ., concur.
MADDOX, HOUSTON and STEAGALL, JJ., dissent.
HORNSBY, C.J., recused.
Dissenting Opinion
I would answer the certified question in the negative. See my dissent in Henderson v. Alabama Power Co.,
Section
"That all courts shall be open; and that every person, for any injury done him, in his lands, goods, person, or reputation, shall have a remedy by due process of law. . . ."
"Remedy" is defined as "[t]he means by which a right is enforced or the violation of a right is . . . compensated." (Emphasis added.) Black's Law Dictionary 1294 (6th ed. 1990). As a noun, the word "right" denotes "a power, privilege, faculty, or demand, inherent in one person and incident upon another"; and, giving the word a juristic content, "a 'right' is well defined as 'a capacity residing in one [person] of controlling, with the assent and assistance of the state, the actions of others.' " Black's Law Dictionary, supra, at 1324. It is familiar law in this state that punitive damages are not recoverable as a matter of right, except as may be provided by statute. Alabama Power Co. v. Rembert,
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.