Supreme Court of Alabama, 1993

Ramsey v. Disciplinary Board of the Alabama State Bar

Ramsey v. Disciplinary Board of the Alabama State Bar
Supreme Court of Alabama · Decided June 11, 1993 · Adams, Hornsby, Shores, Houston, Ingram
621 So. 2d 1319; 1993 Ala. LEXIS 569; 1993 WL 196245 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Ramsey v. Disciplinary Board of the Alabama State Bar

Opinion of the Court

ADAMS, Justice.

Richard H. Ramsey III appeals from a 45-day suspension from the practice of law imposed by the Disciplinary Board of the Alabama State Bar. We affirm.

Mr. Ramsey was charged with violating DR 1-102(A)(4), (5), and (6), and he was found guilty on all three counts. After carefully considering the arguments of both parties and thoroughly examining the record on appeal, we conclude that the order of the Disciplinary Board is due to be affirmed on the authority of Noojin v. Alabama State Bar, 577 So.2d 420 (Ala. 1990).

AFFIRMED.

HORNSBY, C.J., and SHORES, HOUSTON and INGRAM, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.