Supreme Court of Alabama, 1993

Lucy v. Hartford Underwriters Insurance Co.

Supreme Court of Alabama · Decided June 25, 1993 · Hornsby, Maddox, Shores, Adams, Kennedy, Steagall, Ingram

623 So. 2d 291; 1993 Ala. LEXIS 611; 1993 WL 222690 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Opinion of the Court

ON APPLICATION FOR REHEARING

PER CURIAM.

APPLICATION OVERRULED.

HORNSBY, C.J., and MADDOX, SHORES, ADAMS and KENNEDY, JJ., concur. STEAGALL and INGRAM, JJ., dissent.

INGRAM, Justice

(dissenting).

I dissent from the overruling of the appellants’ application for rehearing. I would grant the rehearing.

It appears to me that the trial was flawed by the admission of illegal and prejudicial evidence that appears to have influenced the jury’s verdict.

STEAGALL, J., concurs.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.