B.D. Nelson Land Development, Inc. v. Jackson
Cases that cite this one
1 later published case cites this decision.
- Van Hoof v. Van Hoof (Ala. 2007)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
After a nonjury trial, the court awarded the plaintiff, Bernadette Jackson, equitable relief and monetary damages. The defendant appealed. Because the trial record shows substantial evidence in support of the equitable relief, we hold, pursuant to the ore terms rule of appellate review, that that portion of the judgment is due to be affirmed.
Because the record contains no evidence to support the monetary award, that portion of the judgment is due to be reversed, with a judgment rendered for the defendant on the plaintiffs claim for monetary damages.
This opinion was prepared by retired Justice Richard L. Jones, sitting as a Justice of this Court pursuant to § 12-18-10(e), Ala. Code 1975.
AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART; AND JUDGMENT RENDERED.
Concurring in Part
(concurring in part; dissenting in part).
I would affirm the judgment of the trial court; therefore, I concur in that part of the opinion that affirms, but I dissent from that part of the opinion that reverses.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.