Supreme Court of Alabama, 1996

Tuscaloosa v. Bd, Trust, police/firemen's Pen Fnd

Tuscaloosa v. Bd, Trust, police/firemen's Pen Fnd
Supreme Court of Alabama · Decided January 19, 1996 · Maddox, Shores, Houston, Kennedy, Ingram, Cook, Butts
677 So. 2d 198; 1996 Ala. LEXIS 34 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Tuscaloosa v. Bd, Trust, police/firemen's Pen Fnd

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. NO OPINION.

See Rule 53(a)(1) and (a)(2)(F), Ala. R.App.P.

*199HOOPER, C.J., and MADDOX, SHORES, HOUSTON, KENNEDY, INGRAM, and COOK, JJ., concur. BUTTS, J., concurs in part and dissents in part.

Concurring in Part

BUTTS, Justice

(concurring in part and dissenting in part).

I concur in the affirmance of the trial court’s judgments, except to the extent that it affirms that portion of the judgments holding that the non-claims statute, Ala.Code 1975, § 11-47-23, applied to the plaintiffs’ claim regarding tax revenues from fire insurance premiums. I dissent from the affir-mance of that portion.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.