Tuscaloosa v. Bd, Trust, police/firemen's Pen Fnd

Supreme Court of Alabama January 19, 1996

Tuscaloosa v. Bd, Trust, police/firemen's Pen Fnd, 677 So. 2d 198 (Ala. 1996)

1996 Ala. LEXIS 34

Maddox, Shores, Houston, Kennedy, Ingram, Cook, Butts

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. NO OPINION.

See Rule 53(a)(1) and (a)(2)(F), Ala. R.App.P.

*199HOOPER, C.J., and MADDOX, SHORES, HOUSTON, KENNEDY, INGRAM, and COOK, JJ., concur. BUTTS, J., concurs in part and dissents in part.

Concurring in Part

BUTTS, Justice

(concurring in part and dissenting in part).

I concur in the affirmance of the trial court’s judgments, except to the extent that it affirms that portion of the judgments holding that the non-claims statute, Ala.Code 1975, § 11-47-23, applied to the plaintiffs’ claim regarding tax revenues from fire insurance premiums. I dissent from the affir-mance of that portion.

Reference

Full Case Name: CITY OF TUSCALOOSA v. BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF the POLICE & FIREMEN'S PENSION FUND CITY OF TUSCALOOSA v. Eddie PUGH Eddie PUGH v. CITY OF TUSCALOOSA BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF the FIREMEN'S AND POLICEMEN'S PENSION & RELIEF FUND v. CITY OF TUSCALOOSA
Status: Published