Ex parte Norfolk Southern Railway Co. v. Norfolk Southern Railway Co.

Supreme Court of Alabama July 18, 1997

Ex parte Norfolk Southern Railway Co. v. Norfolk Southern Railway Co., 700 So. 2d 1199 (Ala. 1997)

1997 Ala. LEXIS 355; 1997 WL 401291

Shores, Kennedy, Cook, Butts, Hooper, Maddox, Houston, See

Dissenting Opinion

HOUSTON, Justice

(dissenting).

I dissent.

See Judge Crawley’s special writing concurring in part and dissenting in part, in Walker v. Norfolk, Southern Ry., 700 So.2d 1195, 1198-99 (Ala.Civ.App. 1996).

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

The petition for the writ of certiorari is denied.

In denying the petition for the writ of certiorari, this Court does not wish to be understood as approving all the language, reasons, or statements of law in the Court of Civil Appeals’ opinion. Horsley v. Horsley, 291 Ala. 782, 280 So.2d 155 (1973).

WRIT DENIED.

*1200ALMON, SHORES, KENNEDY, COOK, and BUTTS, JJ., concur. HOOPER, C.J., and MADDOX, HOUSTON, and SEE, JJ., dissent.

Reference

Full Case Name: Ex Parte Norfolk Southern Railway Company. (Re Arthur L. Walker, Jr. v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company Richard S. Hayth and W. K. Bice).
Cited By: 1 case
Status: Published