Ex parte Norfolk Southern Railway Co. v. Norfolk Southern Railway Co.
Ex parte Norfolk Southern Railway Co. v. Norfolk Southern Railway Co.
700 So. 2d 1199; 1997 Ala. LEXIS 355; 1997 WL 401291
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Ex parte Norfolk Southern Railway Co. v. Norfolk Southern Railway Co.
Dissenting Opinion
(dissenting).
I dissent.
See Judge Crawley’s special writing concurring in part and dissenting in part, in Walker v. Norfolk, Southern Ry., 700 So.2d 1195, 1198-99 (Ala.Civ.App. 1996).
Opinion of the Court
The petition for the writ of certiorari is denied.
In denying the petition for the writ of certiorari, this Court does not wish to be understood as approving all the language, reasons, or statements of law in the Court of Civil Appeals’ opinion. Horsley v. Horsley, 291 Ala. 782, 280 So.2d 155 (1973).
WRIT DENIED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.