Haddock v. Multivac, Inc.

Supreme Court of Alabama September 19, 1997

Haddock v. Multivac, Inc., 703 So. 2d 973 (Ala. 1997)

Shores, Hooper, Almon, Kennedy, Cook, Butts, Houston, Maddox, See

Opinion of the Court

SHORES, Justice.

WRITS QUASHED AS IMPROVIDENTLY GRANTED.

HOOPER, C.J., and ALMON, KENNEDY, COOK, and BUTTS, JJ., concur. HOUSTON, J., concurs in case no. 1960332 and dissents in ease no. 1960311. MADDOX and SEE, JJ., dissent.

Concurring Opinion

HOUSTON, Justice

(concurring in case no. 1960332 and dissenting in case no. 1960311).

I concur in quashing the writ issued on the petition of Multivac, Inc.; however, I dissent *974from the order quashing the writ issued on the petition of J.H. MeClanahan. The plaintiff did not present sufficient evidence that MeClanahan knowingly removed or bypassed the safety device.

Reference

Full Case Name: Ex Parte J.H. McClanahan. Ex Parte Multivac, Inc. (Re Jesse Dwayne Haddock v. Multivac, Inc., and J.H. McClanahan).
Cited By: 1 case
Status: Published