Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Supreme Court of Alabama, 1997

Haddock v. Multivac, Inc.

Haddock v. Multivac, Inc.
Supreme Court of Alabama · Decided September 19, 1997 · Shores, Hooper, Almon, Kennedy, Cook, Butts, Houston, Maddox, See
703 So. 2d 973 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Haddock v. Multivac, Inc.

Opinion of the Court

SHORES, Justice.

WRITS QUASHED AS IMPROVIDENTLY GRANTED.

HOOPER, C.J., and ALMON, KENNEDY, COOK, and BUTTS, JJ., concur. HOUSTON, J., concurs in case no. 1960332 and dissents in ease no. 1960311. MADDOX and SEE, JJ., dissent.

Concurring Opinion

HOUSTON, Justice

(concurring in case no. 1960332 and dissenting in case no. 1960311).

I concur in quashing the writ issued on the petition of Multivac, Inc.; however, I dissent *974from the order quashing the writ issued on the petition of J.H. MeClanahan. The plaintiff did not present sufficient evidence that MeClanahan knowingly removed or bypassed the safety device.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑