Supreme Court of Alabama, 1997

Green v. Southern Energy Homes, Inc.

Green v. Southern Energy Homes, Inc.
Supreme Court of Alabama · Decided October 31, 1997 · Almon, Shores, Kennedy, Cook, Butts, Hooper, Maddox, Houston, See
708 So. 2d 587; 1997 Ala. LEXIS 412; 1997 WL 677174 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Green v. Southern Energy Homes, Inc.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

The petition for the writ of mandamus is denied as to the issue of unconscionability; it is granted as to the other issues. See Ex parte Isbell, 708 So.2d 571 (Ala. 1997).

PETITION GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART.

ALMON, SHORES, KENNEDY, COOK, and BUTTS, JJ., concur. HOOPER, C.J., and MADDOX, HOUSTON, and SEE, JJ., concur in part and dissent in part.

Concurring in Part

HOUSTON, Justice

(concurring in part and dissenting in part).

I would deny the petition. Therefore, I concur insofar as the petition is denied and *588dissent insofar as it is granted. See the dissenting opinion in Ex parte Isbell, 708 So.2d 571, 582 (Ala. 1997) (Hooper, C.J., dissenting, joined by Maddox, Houston, and See, JJ.).

HOOPER, C.J., and MADDOX and SEE, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.