Dobbs v. Siegelman
Supreme Court of Alabama
Dobbs v. Siegelman, 724 So. 2d 1137 (Ala. 1998)
1998 Ala. LEXIS 263; 1998 WL 656106
Almon, Shores, Kennedy, Cook, Lyons, Maddox
Dobbs v. Siegelman
Opinion of the Court
AFFIRMED. NO OPINION.
See Rule 53(a)(1) and (a)(2)(F), Ala. R.App. P.
Concurring Opinion
(concurring specially).
I concur to affirm, but would point out that I did not vote in Ex parte Sierra Club, 674 So.2d 54 (Ala. 1995), a case cited by the trial judge, and I do not necessarily agree with the holding of that case that “a declaratory judgment action is not convertible to a quo warranto action.” 674 So.2d at 58. The provisions of Rule 1, Ala. R. Civ. P., it appears to me, do not major in style but in substance.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- John DOBBS and Audrey Dobbs v. Don SIEGELMAN
- Status
- Published