Dobbs v. Siegelman
Dobbs v. Siegelman
724 So. 2d 1137; 1998 Ala. LEXIS 263; 1998 WL 656106
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Dobbs v. Siegelman
Opinion of the Court
AFFIRMED. NO OPINION.
See Rule 53(a)(1) and (a)(2)(F), Ala. R.App. P.
Concurring Opinion
(concurring specially).
I concur to affirm, but would point out that I did not vote in Ex parte Sierra Club, 674 So.2d 54 (Ala. 1995), a case cited by the trial judge, and I do not necessarily agree with the holding of that case that “a declaratory judgment action is not convertible to a quo warranto action.” 674 So.2d at 58. The provisions of Rule 1, Ala. R. Civ. P., it appears to me, do not major in style but in substance.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.