Supreme Court of Alabama, 2000

Ex Parte Payne

Supreme Court of Alabama · Decided December 15, 2000 · Johnstone

791 So. 2d 408; 2000 WL 1841959 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Cases that cite this one

5 later published cases cite this decision.

Payne v. Allen (11th Cir. 2008)
Miller v. State (Ala. Civ. App. 2011)
Hooks v. State (Ala. Crim. App. 2008)
Brooks v. State (Ala. Crim. App. 2005)
Clemons v. State (Ala. Crim. App. 2005)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

The petition for a writ of certiorari is denied. In denying the petition for the writ of certiorari, this court does not wish to be understood as approving the discussion or the statements of law concerning the petitioner's Brady violation claim in the Court of Criminal Appeals' opinion. Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963). SeeEx parte Pierce [Ms. 1981270, September 1, 2000] ___ So.2d ___ (Ala. 2000) (holding that a constitutional violation claim under Rule 32.1(a), Ala.R.Crim.P., need not meet the requirements of a "newly discovered" evidence *Page 409 claim under Rule 32.1(e), Ala.R.Crim.P.).

WRIT DENIED.

Hooper, C.J., and Cook and Lyons, JJ., concur.

Maddox, J., concurs in the result.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.