Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Supreme Court of Alabama, 2001

Smith v. Sanderson Group, Inc.

Smith v. Sanderson Group, Inc.
Supreme Court of Alabama · Decided May 4, 2001 · Stuart, Houston, See, Lyons, Brown, Harwood, Woodall, Johnstone
801 So. 2d 837; 2001 Ala. LEXIS 150; 2001 WL 470168 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Smith v. Sanderson Group, Inc.

Opinion of the Court

STUART, Justice.

WRIT DENIED.

HOUSTON, SEE, LYONS, BROWN, HARWOOD, and WOODALL, JJ., concur. JOHNSTONE, J., concurs in part and dissents in part.

Concurring in Part

JOHNSTONE, Justice

(concurring in part and dissenting in part).

I concur to deny the writ to revise the orders compelling arbitration of the claims against Sanderson and Conseco. I respectfully dissent from the denial of the writ to revise the order compelling arbitration of the claims against Waverlee, which is neither a signatory nor, I submit, a third party beneficiary.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑