Supreme Court of Alabama, 2002

Ex Parte Conners

Supreme Court of Alabama · Decided May 24, 2002 · Moore

837 So. 2d 326; 2002 Ala. LEXIS 163; 2002 WL 1042342 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Cases that cite this one

3 later published cases cite this decision.

Ex Parte Deramus (Ala. 2003)
Boyd v. State (Ala. Crim. App. 2003)
Coughlin v. State (Ala. Crim. App. 2002)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

The petition for the writ of certiorari is denied. In a per curiam opinion holding that Ex parte Berry, 794 So.2d 307 (Ala. 2000), does not control Charles E. Conners's case, the Court of Criminal Appeals affirmed the trial court's judgment. In denying the petition for the writ of certiorari, this Court does not wish to be understood as approving all the language, reasons, or statements of law in the Court of Criminal Appeals' opinion. Horsley v. Horsley, 291 Ala. 782, 280 So.2d 155 (1973).

WRIT DENIED.

Houston, Lyons, Johnstone, and Woodall, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.