Ex Parte Lansdell
Cases that cite this one
1 later published case cites this decision.
- State v. Garner (Ala. Crim. App. 2009)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
Ex parte Brandon Lee LANSDELL.
(In re Brandon Lee Lansdell v. State of Alabama).
Supreme Court of Alabama.
Kevin D. Teague, Decatur, for petitioner.
Submitted on petitioner's brief only.
Prior report: Ala.Crim.App., 25 So.3d 1169.
PER CURIAM.
WRIT DENIED. NO OPINION.
See Rule 39(d)(6), Ala. R.App. P.
COBB, C.J., and LYONS, STUART, and BOLIN, JJ., concur.
MURDOCK, J., concurs specially.
MURDOCK, Justice (concurring specially).
I concur in this Court's order denying certiorari review and citing Rule 39(d)(6), Ala. R.App. P. I continue, however, to hold the view I expressed in my similar vote to deny certiorari review in Ex parte Soto, 991 So.2d 691, 697 (Ala. 2008) (Murdock, J., concurring specially): "Structurally, syntactically, and grammatically, § 13A-10-15(a), Ala.Code 1975, is nonsensical."
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.