Supreme Court of Alabama, 2009

Ex Parte Lansdell

Ex Parte Lansdell
Supreme Court of Alabama · Decided June 12, 2009 · Cobb, Lyons, Stuart, Bolin, Murdock
25 So. 3d 1183; 2009 Ala. LEXIS 144; 2009 WL 1643344 (Southern Reporter, Third Series)

Ex Parte Lansdell

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

WRIT DENIED. NO OPINION.

See Rule 39(d)(6), Ala. RApp. P.

COBB, C.J., and LYONS, STUART, and BOLIN, JJ., concur. MURDOCK, J., concurs specially.

Concurring Opinion

MURDOCK, Justice

(concurring specially).

I concur in this Court’s order denying certiorari review and citing Rule 39(d)(6), Ala. RApp. P. I continue, however, to hold the view I expressed in my similar vote to deny certiorari review in Ex parte Soto, 991 So.2d 691, 697 (Ala. 2008) (Murdock, J., concurring specially): “Structurally, syntactically, and grammatically, § 13A-10-15(a), Ala.Code 1975, is nonsensical.”

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.