Arkansas Court of Appeals, 2014

Webb v. State

Webb v. State
Arkansas Court of Appeals · Decided November 12, 2014 · Rita W. Gruber
2014 Ark. App. 637
Webb v. State

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

Cite as 2014 Ark. App. 637

ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS

DIVISION II No. CR-14-279

MICHAEL WEBB, JR. Opinion Delivered November 12, 2014

APPELLANT

APPEAL FROM THE DREW V. COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT

[NO. CR-2010-162-3A] STATE OF ARKANSAS HONORABLE ROBERT BYNUM

APPELLEE GIBSON, JR., JUDGE

SUPPLEMENTAL ADDENDUM

ORDERED RITA W. GRUBER, Judge

Michael Webb, Jr., appeals the circuit court’s revocation of his probation. He raises two points, contending (1) that the court’s finding that he violated terms of his probation by constructively possessing a firearm and drugs was clearly against the preponderance of the evidence, and (2) that his due-process rights were violated because the court considered matters that were not contained in the State’s petition to revoke. The State responds that the court did not err by finding that Webb violated terms of his probation;1 it does not respond to the second point.

We remand for supplementation of the addendum to Webb’s brief because it lacks important pages of the 2013 sentencing order. Without these pages, we are unable to confirm that this is indeed a revocation case or to ascertain the underlying offenses. See Ark. Sup. Ct.

Cite as 2014 Ark. App. 637

R. 4-2(a)(8)(A)(i) (2014) (requiring that the addendum to appellant’s brief include the order from which the appeal is taken). We order Webb to file, within seven calendar days of this opinion, a supplemental addendum providing the relevant pages from the record. Ark. Sup. Ct. R. 4-2(b)(4) (2014). We also encourage review of our rules to ensure that no other deficiencies are present.

WALMSLEY and HARRISON, JJ., agree.

Timothy R. Leonard, for appellant.

Dustin McDaniel, Att’y Gen., by: Nicana C. Sherman, Ass’t Att’y Gen., for appellee.

1 The State’s argument simply asserts that we should affirm the circuit court’s finding that appellant constructively possessed the drugs and the firearm.

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.