Steele v. Lyon
Steele v. Lyon
Opinion
Cite as
2015 Ark. App. 70ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION I No. CV-14-72
JENNIFER STEELE Opinion Delivered February 11, 2015 APPELLANT APPEAL FROM THE PULASKI V. COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT, TWELFTH DIVISION [NO. 60DR-13-2293] JOHN LYON APPELLEE HONORABLE ALICE S. GRAY, JUDGE
SUPPLEMENTAL ADDENDUM ORDERED
RAYMOND R. ABRAMSON, Judge
Jennifer Steele brings this appeal from the order of protection entered by the Pulaski
County Circuit Court on September 10, 2013, in favor of Steele’s former boyfriend, appellee
John Lyon. The issues on appeal are (1)whether the trial court erred in allowing appellee to
testify or erred in admitting certain evidence during his testimony that appellant argues was
not provided in discovery; (2) whether the trial court erred in ruling that the case fell within
the scope of the Domestic Abuse Act; (3) whether the trial court erred in allowing appellee’s
Exhibit 1 into evidence; (4) whether the trial court erred in allowing appellant to read text
messages into the record that she could not authenticate; and (5) whether sufficient evidence
supported the trial court’s ruling in favor of appellee. We are unable to reach the merits of
Steele’s arguments at this time due to deficiencies in her addendum. Because the addendum Cite as
2015 Ark. App. 70is not in compliance with Arkansas Supreme Court Rule 4-2(a)(8), we order appellant to file
a supplemental addendum.
Rule 4-2(a)(8) requires the addendum to contain all documents in the record that “are
essential for the appellate court to confirm its jurisdiction, to understand the case, and to
decide the issues on appeal.” Specifically, the Rule requires “any order extending the time to
file the record on appeal” to be included in the addendum. Ark. Sup. Ct. R. 4-2(a)(8)(A)(i)
(2014). Because appellant has not included the circuit court’s order granting the extension of
time to lodge the record, we direct her to correct this deficiency by filing a supplemental
addendum within seven calendar days from the date of this opinion. Ark. Sup. Ct. R. 4-
2(b)(4). See In re 4-2(b) of the Rules of the Supreme Court,
2011 Ark. 141. We strongly
encourage appellate counsel, prior to filing the supplemental addendum, to review our rules
as well as the addendum to ensure that no additional deficiencies are present.
Supplemental addendum ordered.
HARRISON and GLOVER, JJ., agree.
Scott A. Strain, for appellant.
Robertson Law Firm, by: Bonnie Robertson, for appellee.
2
Reference
- Cited By
- 1 case
- Status
- Published