Courtney Young v. Shelter Mutual Insurance Company
Courtney Young v. Shelter Mutual Insurance Company
Opinion
Cite as 2020 Ark. App. 575 Reason: I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS document No. CV-20-201 Date: 2021-08-23 14:10:07 Foxit PhantomPDF Version: 9.7.5 Opinion Delivered: December 9, 2020 COURTNEY YOUNG APPEAL FROM THE PHILLIPS APPELLANT COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT [NO. 54CV-17-324] V. HONORABLE CHRISTOPHER W.
MORLEDGE, JUDGE SHELTER MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY SUPPLEMENTAL RESPONSE APPELLEE ORDERED
PER CURIAM We have pending before this court a motion filed by the appellant, Courtney Young, to strike supplemental addendum and arguments pertaining to the supplemental addendum contained in the response brief filed by the appellee, Shelter Mutual Insurance Company.
For the reasons set forth in this per curiam, we order appellee to file a supplemental response.
Appellant alleges that appellee’s supplemental addendum contains documents that are not contained in the record on appeal and therefore must be struck. Appellee responded in pertinent part by stating, “There is no question Supplemental Addendum Nos. 1 through were and are a part of the record.” However, appellee does not identify the page numbers where these documents are located in the record on appeal. Thus, we order appellee to file a supplemental response within seven (7) calendar days and identify the page number(s) in the record on appeal where the exhibits referred to as “Supplemental Addendum Nos. 1 through 16” are located.
Supplemental response ordered.
David A. Hodges, for appellant.
Matthews, Sanders & Sayes, P.A., by: James T. Sayes, for appellee.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.