UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL on MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION

IN RE: ROUNDUP PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION MDL No. 2741

(SEE ATTACHED SCHEDULE)

CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER (CTO —144)

On October 3, 2016, the Panel transferred 19 civil action(s) to the United States District Court for the Northern District of California for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings pursuant to

. See

(J.P.M.L. 2016). Since that time, 1,279 additional action(s) have been transferred to the Northern District of California. With the consent of that court, all such actions have been assigned to the Honorable Vince Chhabria. It appears that the action(s) on this conditional transfer order involve questions of fact that are common to the actions previously transferred to the Northern District of California and assigned to Judge Chhabria. Pursuant to Rule 7.1 of the Rules of Procedure of the United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, the action(s) on the attached schedule are transferred under

to the Northern District of California for the reasons stated in the order of October 3, 2016, and, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Vince Chhabria. This order does not become effective until it is filed in the Office of the Clerk of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. The transmittal of this order to said Clerk shall be stayed 7 days from the entry thereof. If any party files a notice of opposition with the Clerk of the Panel within this 7-day period, the stay will be continued until further order of the Panel.

Inasmuch as no objection is FOR THE PANEL: pending at this time, the stay is lifted. no Cri SL. Ras annexed Aug 02, 2019 instrument is a true and correct copy CLERK'S OFFICE John W. Nichols of the original on file in my office. JUDICIAL PANEL ON Clerk of the Parrest: MULTIBISTRICT LITIGATION SUSAN Y. SOONG Clerk, U.S. District Court Northern District of California

Deputy Sb Dater.2 August 2019

IN RE: ROUNDUP PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION MDL No. 2741

SCHEDULE CTO-144 — TAG-ALONG ACTIONS

DIST DIV. C.A.NO. CASE CAPTION

ALABAMA SOUTHERN ALS 1 19—00324 Weaver v. Monsanto Company ARKANSAS EASTERN ARE 3 19-00212 Estate of Elja McDonald v. Monsanto Company COLORADO CO 1 19—02080 Christopherson et al v. Monsanto Company FLORIDA MIDDLE FLM 2 19-00498 Kozio et al v. Monsanto Company FLORIDA NORTHERN FLN 4 19—00208 BOATRIGHT v. MONSANTO COMPANY et al IDAHO ID 4 19-00252 Hoge v. Monsanto Company MASSACHUSETTS MA 1 19-11423 Nelson et al v. Monsanto Company MISSISSIPPI SOUTHERN MSS 5 19—00057 Tory v. Monsanto Company MISSOURI EASTERN MOE 4 19-01529 Geich v. Monsanto Company MOE 4 19-01852 Cyphers v. Monsanto Company MOE 4 19-01854 Gaj v. Monsanto Company

MOB 4 1902026 Bronzint+etalby—Mensante-Company Opposed 7/26/19 MOE 4 19-02035 Baisden v. Monsanto Company MOE 4 19-02036 Dietz v. Monsanto Company MOE 4 19-02038 Ellis v. Monsanto Company MOE 4 19—02040 Butler v. Monsanto Company NEW HAMPSHIRE NH 1 19-00689 Joseph v. Monsanto Company NH 1 19-00690 Allen v. Monsanto Company NH 1 19-00691 Rounds v. Monsanto Company NH 1 19-00698 Plummer et al v. Monsanto Company NORTH CAROLINA MIDDLE NCM 1 19—-00612 ROSENBERG v. MONSANTO COMPANY OREGON OR 3 19-01078 Weeder v. Monsanto Company TEXAS SOUTHERN TXS 4 19-02497 Del-Sol Auten v. Monsanto Company