Jackson v. Does
Jackson v. Does
Trial Court Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DIVISION OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION WARREN JACKSON PLAINTIFF v. 4:19-cv-00696-BRW DOES, et al. DEFENDANTS ORDER Plaintiff is suing “family/police, all of them” because they get government checks and don’t want to see [him] do better”; have prevented him from getting his CDL; and have taken things out of his car.1 Plaintiff also asserts: “I believe in God and go to church.”2 A district court has the authority to dismiss a case sua sponte for failure to state a claim.3 Because Plaintiff’s Complaint is nonsensical and states no cause of action against Defendants for which relief may be granted, this case is DISMISSED. The motion to proceed in forma
pauperis (Doc. No. 1) is DENIED. IT IS SO ORDERED this 7th day of October, 2019.
Billy Roy Wilson UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
1Doc. No. 2. 2Id. 3See Smith v. Boyd,
945 F.2d 1041(8th Cir. 1991).
Reference
- Status
- Unknown