UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL on MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION

IN RE: ROUNDUP PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION MDL No. 2741

(SEE ATTACHED SCHEDULE)

CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER (CTO —-159)

On October 3, 2016, the Panel transferred 19 civil action(s) to the United States District Court for the Northern District of California for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings pursuant to

. See

(J.P.M.L. 2016). Since that time, 1,812 additional action(s) have been transferred to the Northern District of California. With the consent of that court, all such actions have been assigned to the Honorable Vince Chhabria. It appears that the action(s) on this conditional transfer order involve questions of fact that are common to the actions previously transferred to the Northern District of California and assigned to Judge Chhabria. Pursuant to Rule 7.1 of the Rules of Procedure of the United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, the action(s) on the attached schedule are transferred under

to the Northern District of California for the reasons stated in the order of October 3, 2016, and, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Vince Chhabria. This order does not become effective until it is filed in the Office of the Clerk of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. The transmittal of this order to said Clerk shall be stayed 7 days from the entry thereof. If any party files a notice of opposition with the Clerk of the Panel within this 7—day period, the stay will be continued until further order of the Panel.

Inasmuch as no objection is FOR THE PANEL: pending at this time, the stay is lifted. ed. Z, ol, Oct 17, 2019 ereby certify that the annexeg ohn W. Nichols CLERK’S OFFICE, instrunentis a true and correct UNITED STATES oot thd original on fle inmy ofc lerk of the Panel MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION SUSAN Y. SOONG Clerk, U.S. District Court Northem District of Califomia

Deputy Clerk l

IN RE: ROUNDUP PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION MDL No. 2741

SCHEDULE CTO−159 − TAG−ALONG ACTIONS

DIST DIV. C.A.NO. CASE CAPTION ARKANSAS EASTERN ARE 5 19−00321 Davenport v. Monsanto Company CALIFORNIA CENTRAL CAC 5 19−01811 Dylan Sampsel v. Monsanto Company

FLORIDA MIDDLE FLM 2 19−00629 Cooksey v. Monsanto Company FLM 3 19−00991 Carter v. Monsanto Company FLM 3 19−01002 Messina v. Monsanto Company FLM 3 19−01009 Anstett v. Monsanto Company FLM 3 19−01024 Corbett v. Monsanto Company FLM 3 19−01056 Drover v. Monsanto Company FLM 5 19−00410 Oldfield v. Monsanto Company FLM 8 19−02126 Dougherty v. Monsanto Company FLM 8 19−02132 Perry v. Monsanto Company FLM 8 19−02134 Dwyer v. Monsanto Company FLM 8 19−02231 Wolfe v. Monsanto Company FLORIDA NORTHERN FLN 3 19−03321 STOCKLAND v. MONSANTO COMPANY FLN 3 19−03339 FERGUSON v. MONSANTO COMPANY FLN 3 19−03359 CROUCH v. MONSANTO COMPANY FLN 5 19−00307 PHILLIPS v. MONSANTO COMPANY FLORIDA SOUTHERN FLS 0 19−62126 Batson v. Monsanto Company FLS 0 19−62148 Ploplis v. Monsanto Company GAM 3 19−00079 FORWARD v. MONSANTO COMPANY GEORGIA NORTHERN GAN 1 19−03943 Clock v. Monsanto Company GAN 1 19−03944 Edelstein v. Monsanto Company GAN 1 19−03957 Scroggs v. Monsanto Company GAN 1 19−03958 Selby v. Monsanto Company GAN 2 19−00196 Payne v. Monsanto Company GEORGIA SOUTHERN GAS 2 19−00103 Woodcock v. Monsanto Company KENTUCKY WESTERN KYW 3 19−00646 Colvin v. Monsanto Company MARYLAND MD 1 19−02440 Sigwart et al v. Monsanto Company NEW YORK SOUTHERN NYS 1 19−08422 Rung et al v. Monsanto Company OHIO NORTHERN OHN 5 19−02128 Miller v. Monsanto Company