Rainey v. MedPartners Inc

United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas

Rainey v. MedPartners Inc

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION

CRYSTAL RAINEY, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated PLAINTIFF

No. 4:18-cv-267-DPM

MEDPARTNERS, INC. DEFENDANT ORDER Pointing to the need to arrive early, work through lunch, stay late, and MedPartners’s timesheet policy, Ne 40 at 2-4, Ne 39 at 9, Ne 39-3, Rainey says she worked more than forty hours a week as a Nurse Practitioner, but MedPartners didn’t pay her enough overtime. Pointing to Rainey’s signed timesheets, patient logs, and paid lunch break policy, Ne 33-1, Ne 33-2, Ne 33-3, Ne 40 at 2-4, MedPartners responds that Rainey never worked overtime. There’s no way to resolve the genuinely disputed material facts short of a trial. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.,

477 U.S. 242, 250-51

(1986). We'll have one as scheduled on 10 February 2020. MedPartners’s motion for summary judgment, Ne 33, is denied. So Ordered. eae DP. Marshall Jv. United States District Judge IS Nerveuher a0/9

Reference

Status
Unknown