Rainey v. MedPartners Inc
Rainey v. MedPartners Inc
Trial Court Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION
CRYSTAL RAINEY, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated PLAINTIFF
No. 4:18-cv-267-DPM
MEDPARTNERS, INC. DEFENDANT ORDER Pointing to the need to arrive early, work through lunch, stay late, and MedPartners’s timesheet policy, Ne 40 at 2-4, Ne 39 at 9, Ne 39-3, Rainey says she worked more than forty hours a week as a Nurse Practitioner, but MedPartners didn’t pay her enough overtime. Pointing to Rainey’s signed timesheets, patient logs, and paid lunch break policy, Ne 33-1, Ne 33-2, Ne 33-3, Ne 40 at 2-4, MedPartners responds that Rainey never worked overtime. There’s no way to resolve the genuinely disputed material facts short of a trial. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.,
477 U.S. 242, 250-51(1986). We'll have one as scheduled on 10 February 2020. MedPartners’s motion for summary judgment, Ne 33, is denied. So Ordered. eae DP. Marshall Jv. United States District Judge IS Nerveuher a0/9
Reference
- Status
- Unknown