Markham v. Dalton
Markham v. Dalton
Trial Court Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS TEXARKANA DIVISION MICHAEL EUGENE MARKHAM PLAINTIFF v. Civil No. 4:19-cv-4114 JAILER POTTER DALTON; JAIL ADMINISTRATOR JANA TALLENT; DEPUTY SHERIFF JOHN ERIC; JAILER TURNER REED; JAILER ETHAN NOWLEN; and SHERIFF BRIAN MCJUNKINS DEFENDANTS ORDER Before the Court is Plaintiff’s failure to obey a court order and failure to prosecute this case. Plaintiff Michael Eugene Markham filed his Complaint and Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (“IFP”) on September 11, 2019. (ECF Nos. 1, 2). That same day, the Court entered an order noting that Plaintiff’s Application for IFP failed to include page two (2) of the application. (ECF No. 3). The order directed Plaintiff to either complete the IFP application or pay the filing fee for this case by October 1, 2019. (ECF No. 3). Plaintiff was advised that if he failed “to file the completed IFP application or pay the $400 by October 1, 2019, the complaint shall be dismissed, without further notice, for failure to obey an order of the Court.” Id. As of the date of this order, Plaintiff has failed to file a completed IFP application or pay the filing fee. Although pro se pleadings are to be construed liberally, a pro se litigant is not excused from complying with substantive and procedural law. Burgs v. Sissel,
745 F.2d 526, 528(8th Cir. 1984). Additionally, the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure specifically contemplate dismissal of a case on the grounds that the plaintiff failed to prosecute or failed to comply with orders of the court. Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b); Link v. Wabash R.R. Co.,
370 U.S. 626, 630-31(1962) (stating that the district court possesses the power to dismiss sua sponte under Rule 41(b)). Pursuant to Rule 41(b), a district court has the power to dismiss an action based on “the plaintiff’s failure to comply with any court order.” Brown v. Frey,
806 F.2d 801, 803-04(8th Cir. 1986) (emphasis added).
Plaintiff has failed to obey a court order and has failed to prosecute this case. Accordingly, Plaintiff’s Complaint (ECF No. 1) should be and hereby is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. IT IS SO ORDERED, this 30th day of October, 2019. /s/ Susan O. Hickey Susan O. Hickey Chief United States District Judge
Reference
- Status
- Unknown