Flowers v. Monsanto Company
Flowers v. Monsanto Company
Trial Court Opinion
FILE U.S. DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT ARKANSAS Jan 24. 2020 UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL on W. McCORMACK, CLERK MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION Jake Kornegay D.C. DEP CLERK IN RE: ROUNDUP PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION MDL No. 2741
(SEE ATTACHED SCHEDULE)
CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER (CTO —181)
On October 3, 2016, the Panel transferred 19 civil action(s) to the United States District Court for the Northern District of California for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings pursuant to
28 U.S.C. § 1407. See
214 F.Supp.3d 1346(J.P.M.L. 2016). Since that time, 2,284 additional action(s) have been transferred to the Northern District of California. With the consent of that court, all such actions have been assigned to the Honorable Vince Chhabria. It appears that the action(s) on this conditional transfer order involve questions of fact that are common to the actions previously transferred to the Northern District of California and assigned to Judge Chhabria. Pursuant to Rule 7.1 of the Rules of Procedure of the United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, the action(s) on the attached schedule are transferred under
28 U.S.C. § 1407to the Northern District of California for the reasons stated in the order of October 3, 2016, and, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Vince Chhabria. This order does not become effective until it is filed in the Office of the Clerk of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. The transmittal of this order to said Clerk shall be stayed 7 days from the entry thereof. If any party files a notice of opposition with the Clerk of the Panel within this 7-day period, the stay will be continued until further order of the Panel.
Inasmuch as no objection is FOR THE PANEL: pending at this time, the stay is lifted. Lf AU —— Jan 24, 2020 ( OrUNTeD STATES John W. Nichols MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION Clerk of the Panel | hereby certify that the annexed instrument is a true and correct copy of the original on file in my office.
Y. SOONG U.S. District Court District of Califomia WELLL Jane 4. 2020
IN RE: ROUNDUP PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION MDL No. 2741
SCHEDULE CTO−181 − TAG−ALONG ACTIONS
DIST DIV. C.A.NO. CASE CAPTION ARKANSAS EASTERN ARE 2 20−00005 Flowers v. Monsanto Company ARKANSAS WESTERN ARW 5 19−05232 Hughen v. Monsanto Company et al ARW 5 19−05233 Robbins v. Monsanto Company et al ARW 6 20−06002 Lowe v. Monsanto Company FLORIDA MIDDLE FLM 2 20−00011 Belfleur et al v. Monsanto Company FLM 2 20−00018 Russell v. Monsanto Company MISSISSIPPI NORTHERN MSN 3 19−00293 Wallace v. Monsanto Company et al MSN 3 19−00297 Newsom et al v. Monsanto Company et al MISSISSIPPI SOUTHERN MSS 2 20−00002 Smith v. Monsanto Company MISSOURI EASTERN MOE 4 19−03279 Duncan et al v. Monsanto Company MOE 4 19−03280 Dierkes et al v. Monsanto Company MOE 4 19−03349 Dziewa v. Monsanto Company MOE 4 19−03356 Murray v. Monsanto Company MOE 4 19−03359 Schrum et al v. Monsanto Company MOE 4 19−03386 Gloudemans v. Monsanto Company MOE 4 19−03387 Herod et al v. Monsanto Company TENNESSEE EASTERN WASHINGTON EASTERN WAE 2 20−00016 Angioi v. Monsanto Company et al
Reference
- Status
- Unknown