hy U.S. DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT ARKANSAS Feb 10, 2020 UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL on McCORMACK. CLERK MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION Jake Kornegay D.C. DEP CLERK IN RE: ROUNDUP PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION MDL No. 2741

(SEE ATTACHED SCHEDULE)

CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER (CTO —185)

On October 3, 2016, the Panel transferred 19 civil action(s) to the United States District Court for the Northern District of California for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings pursuant to

. See

(J.P.M.L. 2016). Since that time, 2,410 additional action(s) have been transferred to the Northern District of California. With the consent of that court, all such actions have been assigned to the Honorable Vince Chhabria. It appears that the action(s) on this conditional transfer order involve questions of fact that are common to the actions previously transferred to the Northern District of California and assigned to Judge Chhabria. Pursuant to Rule 7.1 of the Rules of Procedure of the United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, the action(s) on the attached schedule are transferred under

to the Northern District of California for the reasons stated in the order of October 3, 2016, and, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Vince Chhabria. This order does not become effective until it is filed in the Office of the Clerk of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. The transmittal of this order to said Clerk shall be stayed 7 days from the entry thereof. If any party files a notice of opposition with the Clerk of the Panel within this 7-day period, the stay will be continued until further order of the Panel.

Inasmuch as no objection is FOR THE PANEL: pending at this time, the stay is lifted. LA £ Far □ Feb 10, 2020 CLERK'S OFFICE John W. Nichols A NTED STATES Clerk of the Panel | hereby certify that the annexed MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION instrument is a true and correct copy of the original on file in my office.

Y. SOONG U.S. District Court District of California MBNLLL February 10, 2020

IN RE: ROUNDUP PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION MDL No. 2741

SCHEDULE CTO−185 − TAG−ALONG ACTIONS

DIST DIV. C.A.NO. CASE CAPTION ARKANSAS EASTERN ARE 3 20−00027 Atherton v. Monsanto Company et al ARKANSAS WESTERN ARW 6 20−06009 Goodman v. Monsanto Company et al FLORIDA MIDDLE

FLM 8 19−03191 Campbell v. Monsanto Company FLM 8 19−03207 Mulder v. Monsanto Company FLORIDA SOUTHERN FLS 2 20−14009 Creamer v. Monsanto Company MARYLAND MD 1 20−00139 Miller et al v. Monsanto Company MICHIGAN EASTERN MIE 2 19−13601 Sarafian et al v. Monsanto Company NEBRASKA NE 8 20−00044 Kaup et al v. Monsanto Company NE 8 20−00048 Sachau et al v. Monsanto Company NEW YORK NORTHERN NYN 5 19−01008 Faes v. Monsanto Company et al NYN 5 19−01011 Connolly v. Monsanto Company et al NYW 1 20−00094 Lakso v. Monsanto Company et al NYW 1 20−00095 King v. Monsanto Company et al NYW 1 20−00096 White v. Monsanto Company et al NYW 6 20−06046 Nesbitt v. Monsanto Company et al OHIO SOUTHERN OHS 1 19−01000 Dektas et al v. Monsanto Company SOUTH CAROLINA SC 3 20−00324 Duncan et al v. Monsanto Company