Miller v. Pantano
Miller v. Pantano
Trial Court Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS CENTRAL DIVISION
HARRY KEITH MILLER PLAINTIFF V. 4:19CV00766 JM SONYA PANTANO, et al, DEFENDANTS ORDER On January 24, 2020, the Court ordered Plaintiff to file an amendment or supplement to his Complaint on or before Friday, February 7, 2020. Plaintiff has failed to respond. Further, Plaintiff has not communicated with the Court since he filed the Complaint on October 29, 2019. Therefore, the case is dismissed without prejudice for Plaintiff's failure to prosecute. See Link v. Wabash R. Co.,
370 U.S. 626, 629-30,
82 S.Ct. 1386, 1388(1962) ("The authority of a federal trial court to dismiss a plaintiff's action with prejudice because of his failure to prosecute cannot seriously be doubted. The power to invoke this sanction is necessary in order to prevent undue delays in the disposition of pending cases and to avoid congestion in the calendars of the District Courts."); Fed. R.Civ. P. 41(b); Rules of the United States District Court for the Eastern and Western Districts of Arkansas, LR5.5(c)(2). Defendant’s motion to dismiss (ECF No. 11) is GRANTED without prejudice. The case is dismissed without prejudice for Plaintiff's failure to prosecute. The Clerk is directed to close the case. IT IS SO ORDERED this 26th day of February, 2020.
United States District Fudge
Reference
- Status
- Unknown