U.S. DISTRICT COURT tance erenna ve UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL Mar 11, 2020 on ES W. MCCORMACK. CLERK MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION By: Jake Kornegay D.C. DEP CLERK IN RE: ROUNDUP PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION MDL No. 2741

(SEE ATTACHED SCHEDULE)

CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER (CTO —192)

On October 3, 2016, the Panel transferred 19 civil action(s) to the United States District Court for the Northern District of California for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings pursuant to

. See

(J.P.M.L. 2016). Since that time, 2,534 additional action(s) have been transferred to the Northern District of California. With the consent of that court, all such actions have been assigned to the Honorable Vince Chhabria. It appears that the action(s) on this conditional transfer order involve questions of fact that are common to the actions previously transferred to the Northern District of California and assigned to Judge Chhabria. Pursuant to Rule 7.1 of the Rules of Procedure of the United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, the action(s) on the attached schedule are transferred under

to the Northern District of California for the reasons stated in the order of October 3, 2016, and, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Vince Chhabria. This order does not become effective until it is filed in the Office of the Clerk of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. The transmittal of this order to said Clerk shall be stayed 7 days from the entry thereof. If any party files a notice of opposition with the Clerk of the Panel within this 7-day period, the stay will be continued until further order of the Panel.

FOR THE PANEL: Inasmuch as no objection is ndin his time, th Sayisitied ed. CALA Mar 10, 2020 CLERK'S OFFICE John W. Nichols ah grec copy uaa NEON Clerk of the Panel of the original on file in my office. ATTEST: Y. SOONG U.S. District Court District of Califomia

March 11, 2020

IN RE: ROUNDUP PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION MDL No. 2741

SCHEDULE CTO−192 − TAG−ALONG ACTIONS

DIST DIV. C.A.NO. CASE CAPTION ARKANSAS EASTERN ARE 4 20−00193 George et al v. Monsanto Company IOWA SOUTHERN IAS 4 20−00071 Linn v. Monsanto Company, Inc. LOUISIANA EASTERN

LAE 2 20−00636 Hurst v. Monsanto Company LAE 2 20−00637 Morales v. Monsanto Company NEBRASKA NE 8 20−00074 Pearson et al v. Monsanto Company NE 8 20−00075 Vollmar v. Monsanto Company NEW YORK EASTERN NYE 2 19−07286 Short v. Monsanto Company NEW YORK WESTERN NYW 1 20−00240 Bauman III v. Monsanto Company et al