Range v. Social Security Administration
Range v. Social Security Administration
Trial Court Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS NORTHERN DIVISION
TRACY RANGE PLAINTIFF
No. 3:19-cv-241-DPM
ANDREW SAUL’, Commissioner, Social Security Administration DEFENDANT
ORDER Range has objected to the Magistrate Judge’s recommendation, so the Court has reviewed the Commissioner’s decision de novo. FED. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3). The ALJ’s opinion is thorough: he considered all of Range’s conditions and medications; likewise, he considered the expert’s testimony about all the hypotheticals, including those Range highlights. Substantial evidence on the record as a whole supports the ALJ's decision; and the Court sees no error of law. Wright v. Colvin,
789 F.3d 847, 852(8th Cir. 2015). Objections, Doc. 18, overruled. Recommendation, Doc. 17, adopted. The Court will dismiss Range’s complaint with prejudice.
* The Court directs the Clerk to update the docket to reflect that Andrew Saul is now the Commissioner.
So Ordered. oprah D.P. Marshall Jr. United States District Judge
AT Ap 2020
_2-
Reference
- Status
- Unknown