Range v. Social Security Administration

United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas

Range v. Social Security Administration

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS NORTHERN DIVISION

TRACY RANGE PLAINTIFF

No. 3:19-cv-241-DPM

ANDREW SAUL’, Commissioner, Social Security Administration DEFENDANT

ORDER Range has objected to the Magistrate Judge’s recommendation, so the Court has reviewed the Commissioner’s decision de novo. FED. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3). The ALJ’s opinion is thorough: he considered all of Range’s conditions and medications; likewise, he considered the expert’s testimony about all the hypotheticals, including those Range highlights. Substantial evidence on the record as a whole supports the ALJ's decision; and the Court sees no error of law. Wright v. Colvin,

789 F.3d 847, 852

(8th Cir. 2015). Objections, Doc. 18, overruled. Recommendation, Doc. 17, adopted. The Court will dismiss Range’s complaint with prejudice.

* The Court directs the Clerk to update the docket to reflect that Andrew Saul is now the Commissioner.

So Ordered. oprah D.P. Marshall Jr. United States District Judge

AT Ap 2020

_2-

Reference

Status
Unknown