Carter v. Payne

United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas

Carter v. Payne

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PINE BLUFF DIVISION NICKOL E. CARTER ADC #146315 PETITIONER

No. 5:10-cv-346-DPM

DEXTER PAYNE, Director, Arkansas Division of Correction RESPONDENT

ORDER Motion, Doc. 51, denied. Carter’s motion amounted to a second or successive habeas petition requiring preauthorization from the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit.

28 U.S.C. § 2244

(b)(3)(A); Gonzalez v. Crosby,

545 U.S. 524

, 530-32 & n.5 (2005); Ward v. Norris,

577 F.3d 925, 932-34

(8th Cir. 2009). And in light of Gonzalez, that conclusion isn’t a matter about which reasonable jurists could disagree. Slack v. McDaniel,

529 U.S. 473, 484

(2000). So Ordered.

D.P. Marshall if United States District Judge yf May A020

Reference

Status
Unknown