Brown v. Wilson
Brown v. Wilson
Trial Court Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS NORTHERN DIVISION
EDWARD LEE BROWN PLAINTIFF
v. No. 3:19-cv-320-DPM
JERRY HENRY DEFENDANT
ORDER 1. Brown has provided particulars about his claims against the sole remaining defendant, Jerry Henry. The Court must screen his allegations.
28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2). Henry was an officer with the Osceola Police Department. Doc. 7. Henry approached Brown in July 2007 outside a grocery store, explaining that another officer needed to talk with Brown about his son. Henry did not cuff Brown, Mirandize him, or arrest him. Doc. 2-1 at 27; Doc. 5 at 3. Henry drove Brown to the police station, where he was later charged with two counts of third-degree domestic battering of two children. Doc. 2 at 27 & 63. 2. Brown contends he was illegally seized. Doc. 5 at 3. Assuming an unconstitutional seizure occurred in 2007, Brown has waited too long to raise that claim in this 2019 case. Federal law borrows Arkansas’s three-year statute of limitations, ARK. CODE ANN. § 16-56-105, for this kind of claim under
28 U.S.C. § 1983. Wilson v. Garcia,
471 U.S. 261, 280(1985).
Any individual capacity claim against Henry about the alleged 2007 seizure fails as time-barred; and any official capacity claim about it against Osceola through Henry does, too.
28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (ii). Brown’s claims against Henry will therefore be dismissed with prejudice. An in forma pauperis appeal from this Order and accompanying Judgment would not be taken in good faith.
28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3). So Ordered.
D.P. Marshall Ww United States District Judge ow,
-2-
Reference
- Status
- Unknown