Hause v. Little Rock, City of

United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas

Hause v. Little Rock, City of

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS CENTRAL DIVISION

KANDICE HAUSE PLAINTIFF

v. No. 4:20-cv-21-DPM

CITY OF LITTLE ROCK DEFENDANT

ORDER Status report on fees, Doc. 9, appreciated. The joint motion to dismiss, Doc. 5, is granted. All material things considered, the proposed settlement is fair, reasonable, and adequate. Lynn’s Food Stores, Inc. v. United States,

679 F.2d 1350

, 1353 (11th Cir. 1982); Melgar v. OK Foods,

902 F.3d 775, 779

(8th Cir. 2018). It reflects a good-faith compromise of contested overtime compensation issues. And the attorneys’ fee was handled separately. Doc. 9; Melgar,

902 F.3d at 779

; Barbee v. Big River Steel, LLC,

927 F.3d 1024

, 1027 n.1 (8th Cir. 2019). The Court will dismiss the complaint with prejudice and retain jurisdiction for a time to enforce the parties’ settlement. So Ordered.

D.P. Marshall Jr. United States District Judge 27 fini AodAD

Reference

Status
Unknown