Hause v. Little Rock, City of
Hause v. Little Rock, City of
Trial Court Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS CENTRAL DIVISION
KANDICE HAUSE PLAINTIFF
v. No. 4:20-cv-21-DPM
CITY OF LITTLE ROCK DEFENDANT
ORDER Status report on fees, Doc. 9, appreciated. The joint motion to dismiss, Doc. 5, is granted. All material things considered, the proposed settlement is fair, reasonable, and adequate. Lynn’s Food Stores, Inc. v. United States,
679 F.2d 1350, 1353 (11th Cir. 1982); Melgar v. OK Foods,
902 F.3d 775, 779(8th Cir. 2018). It reflects a good-faith compromise of contested overtime compensation issues. And the attorneys’ fee was handled separately. Doc. 9; Melgar,
902 F.3d at 779; Barbee v. Big River Steel, LLC,
927 F.3d 1024, 1027 n.1 (8th Cir. 2019). The Court will dismiss the complaint with prejudice and retain jurisdiction for a time to enforce the parties’ settlement. So Ordered.
D.P. Marshall Jr. United States District Judge 27 fini AodAD
Reference
- Status
- Unknown