IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS CENTRAL DIVISION LADEANA BIDDLE, et al. PLAINTIFFS

v. CASE NO. 4:19-CV-00327-BSM WENDY KELLEY, et ai. DEFENDANTS

ORDER Plaintiffs’ complaint [Doc. No. 2] is dismissed without prejudice because they have failed to provide defendants’ addresses. Doc. No. 4; See Lee v. Armontrout,

(8th Cir. 1993) (per curiam) (plaintiffs proceeding in forma pauperis are responsible for providing defendants’ addresses), cert. denied,

(1993). Defendants have not been served and the time periods for service or to request an extension for service have expired. See Ark. R. Civ. P. 44)(1)-(2). IT IS SO ORDERED this 18th day of June, 2020.

Baron 2 ri IM UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE