IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS CENTRAL DIVISION KHANIS MORNINGSTAR PLAINTIFF ADC #164590 v. No: 4:20-cv-00835 JM

RITCHIE MALLETT, et al. DEFENDANTS ORDER Plaintiff Khanis Morningstar filed a pro se complaint, pursuant to

, on July 13, 2020 (Doc. No. 2). On July 15, 2020, the Court entered an order denying Morningstar’ □ motion to proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. No. 1) and directing Morningstar to submit the full $400.00 filing and administrative fees or file a fully completed in forma pauperis application within 30 days. See Doc. No. 4. Morningstar was cautioned that failure to comply with the Court’s order within that time would result in the dismissal of his case. More than 30 days have passed, and Morningstar has not complied or otherwise responded to the July 15 order. Accordingly, the Court finds that this action should be dismissed without prejudice for failure to comply with Local Rule 5.5(c)(2) and failure to respond to the Court’s orders. See Miller v. Benson,

(8th Cir. 1995) (District courts have inherent power to dismiss sua sponte a case for failure to prosecute, and exercise of that power is reviewed for abuse of discretion). IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT Morningstar’s complaint (Doc. No. 2) is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. DATED this 20th day of August, 2020. QI sor