Albers v. Social Security Administration
Albers v. Social Security Administration
Trial Court Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS DELTA DIVISION
NATALIE N. ALBERS PLAINTIFF
No. 2:20-cv-33-DPM
ANDREW SAUL’, Commissioner, Social Security Administration DEFENDANT
ORDER Albers has objected to the Magistrate Judge’s recommendation, so the Court has reviewed the Commissioner’s decision de novo. FED. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3). The ALJ’s opinion is thorough. She considered all of the medical records and expert testimony to assess Albers’s health. She appropriately weighed Albers’s testimony and credibility. And her hypotheticals accurately reflected Albers’s impairments, including the one Albers highlights. Substantial evidence on the record as a whole supports the ALJ’s decision; and the Court sees no error of law. Wright v. Colvin,
789 F.3d 847, 852(8th Cir. 2015). Objections, Doc. 10, overruled. Recommendation, Doc. 9, adopted. The Court will dismiss Albers’s complaint with prejudice.
The Court directs the Clerk to update the docket to reflect that Andrew Saul is now the Commissioner.
So Ordered.
D.P. Marshall Jr. United States District Judge | Ocfohn 2020
_2-
Reference
- Status
- Unknown