Sinclair v. Sinclair
United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas
Sinclair v. Sinclair
Trial Court Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS NORTHERN DIVISION
DOMINIQUE SINCLAIR PLAINTIFF
V. No. 3:20-cv-367-DPM
JIMMY SINCLAIR; BRYANT and THERESA WHITE; FRED WHITFIELD; ALEX DILLARD; SAMUEL DOE DEFENDANTS
ORDER 1. Sinclair’s application to proceed in forma pauperis, Doc. 1, is granted. He reports having no income, no assets, and living with friends. 2. The Court must screen Sinclair’s complaint.
28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2). Sinclair’s claim that Defendants are using drones and cameras to threaten him with harm is fanciful and doesn’t state a claim. Denton v. Hernandez,
504 U.S. 25, 32-33(1992);
28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). The Court will dismiss the case without prejudice. So Ordered.
D.P. Marshall Jr. United States District Judge 17 Novem A02x0
Reference
- Status
- Unknown