Beard v. Falls
Beard v. Falls
Trial Court Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS CENTRAL DIVISION
ALONZO F. BEARD PLAINTIFF
VS. 4:20-CV-001356-BRW
OFFICER QUINTON FALLS; DETECTIVE KOURTNEY HARDIN; OFFICER BROOKE WATSON; AD. TECH MONTANA DAVIS DEFENDANTS
ORDER
Plaintiff filed this pro se case on November 17, 2020, under
42 U.S.C. § 1983. He asserts that he has been federally indicted and asks me to review some of the evidence, grant him a writ of habeas corpus, and dismiss pending criminal charges.1 The things he wants reviewed may be relevant in his upcoming criminal trial. The allegations and requested relief involve discovery and evidentiary issues that can be explored by his lawyer in his criminal case. Additionally, none of the relief Plaintiff seeks is available through a § 1983 case. Accordingly, this case is dismissed as frivolous.2 IT IS SO ORDERED this 7th day of December, 2020 (Pearl Harbor Day).
Billy Roy Wilson_________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
1Mr. Beard’s trial is set for March 15, 2021 before the Honorable Brian Miller. See United States v. Beard, No. 4:19-cr-655-BSM-1 (E.D. Ark.).
2Porter v. Fox,
99 F.3d 271, 273 (8th Cir. 1996) (noting that district courts may sua sponte dismiss frivolous complaint prior to service); Fitzgerald v. First E. Seventh St. Tenants Corp.,
221 F.3d 362, 364(2d Cir. 2000) (“[D]istrict courts may dismiss a frivolous complaint sua sponte even when the plaintiff has paid the required filing fee.”).
Reference
- Status
- Unknown