U.S. DISTRICT COURT UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL nn See on Jan 08, 2021 MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION JAMES W. McCORMACK. By: Jake Kornegay D.C DE IN RE: ROUNDUP PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION MDL No. 2741

(SEE ATTACHED SCHEDULE)

CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER (CTO —251)

On October 3, 2016, the Panel transferred 19 civil action(s) to the United States District Court for the Northern District of California for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings pursuant to

. See

(J.P.M.L. 2016). Since that time, 3,185 additional action(s) have been transferred to the Northern District of California. With the consent of that court, all such actions have been assigned to the Honorable Vince Chhabria. It appears that the action(s) on this conditional transfer order involve questions of fact that are common to the actions previously transferred to the Northern District of California and assigned to Judge Chhabria. Pursuant to Rule 7.1 of the Rules of Procedure of the United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, the action(s) on the attached schedule are transferred under

to the Northern District of California for the reasons stated in the order of October 3, 2016, and, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Vince Chhabria. This order does not become effective until it is filed in the Office of the Clerk of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. The transmittal of this order to said Clerk shall be stayed 7 days from the entry thereof. If any party files a notice of opposition with the Clerk of the Panel within this 7-day period, the stay will be continued until further order of the Panel.

Inasmuch as no objection is FOR THE PANEL: cays nd. = Bar Jan 07, 2021 CANITED erares. Jehn W. Nichols MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION (etic tale and soect op OOK of the Panel of the original on file in my office. ATTEST: SUSAN Y. SOONG Clerk, U.S. District Court Norther District of California wv MBENLL. Deputy Clerk Date: 01/0 1/2021

IN RE: ROUNDUP PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION MDL No. 2741

SCHEDULE CTO-251 — TAG-ALONG ACTIONS

DIST DIV. C.A.NO. CASE CAPTION

ARKANSAS EASTERN ARE 4 20-01495 Fennell v. Monsanto Company CALIFORNIA SOUTHERN CAS 3 20-02176 Hammett et al v. Monsanto Company et al FLORIDA SOUTHERN FLS 0 20-62450 Proctor et al v. Monsanto Company ILLINOIS NORTHERN ILN 1 20-07705 Sundararaj v. Monsanto Company IOWA NORTHERN IAN 1 20—00087 Porto v. Monsanto Company LOUISIANA EASTERN LAE 2 20-03439 Legrand v. Monsanto Company MISSISSIPPI SOUTHERN MSS 1 20—00377 Niolet v. Monsanto Company SOUTH CAROLINA SC 2 20—-04302 Kay et al v. Monsanto Company