Gillion v. Hamrick
Gillion v. Hamrick
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS NORTHERN DIVISION
DELOICE GILLION PLAINTIFF
Vv. No. 3:19-cv-234-DPM
ROBERT L. HAMRICK; CELADON TRUCKING SERVICES, INC.; and ANNIE ROSS DEFENDANTS
ORDER The Court appreciates Gillion’s brief on the amendment/remand issue, Doc. 31. Defendants have not weighed in. The Court takes their silence as recognition that joinder of Ross is proper in the circumstances and that remand is required. Because of the jurisdictional cloud over this Court’s summons to her, the motion for default judgment against Ross, Doc. 26, is denied. She must be served again with process from the state court. After reconsideration, the Court permits the joinder of Annie Ross as a defendant. FED. R. Civ. P. 20(a)(2); Bailey v. Bayer CropScience L.P.,
563 F.3d 302, 309(8th Cir. 2009). Gillion’s amended complaint is deemed filed as of today. Ross’s presence destroys complete diversity and thus eliminates this Court’s subject matter jurisdiction. This case is therefore remanded to the Circuit Court of Crittenden County, Arkansas.
28 U.S.C. § 1447(e).
So Ordered. NPnandell D.P. Marshall Jr. United States District Judge 19 Amal 2021
Reference
- Status
- Unknown