Hune v. Social Security Administration
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
CENTRAL DIVISION
LETITIA HUNE PLAINTIFF V. CASE NO. 4:20-CV-916-JTR
ANDREW SAUL, Commissioner
Social Security Administration DEFENDANT ORDER
Plaintiff, Letitia Hune, seeks judicial review of the administrative denial of her claims for disability insurance benefits. Doc. 2. The Commissioner has filed an Unopposed Motion to Reverse and Remand for further administrative proceedings, pursuant to the fourth sentence of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). Doc. 15. The Motion states that Hune’s counsel does not oppose the requested reversal and remand. Id. at 1. Under the circumstances, remand is appropriate.
Accordingly, the Commissioner’s Unopposed Motion to Reverse and Remand, Doc. 15, is GRANTED. The Commissioner’s prior decision is REVERSED, and this matter is REMANDED for further administrative proceedings and issuance of a new decision. This is a “sentence four” remand within the meaning of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) and Melkonyan v. Sullivan, 501 U.S. 89 (1991).
SO ORDERED, this 3rd day of June, 2021.
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.