United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas, 2021

Belmudes v. Social Security Administration

Belmudes v. Social Security Administration
United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas · Decided July 19, 2021
Belmudes v. Social Security Administration

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS

CENTRAL DIVISION

JESSICA BELMUDES PLAINTIFF V. No. 4:20-CV-445-JTR

KILOLO KIJAKAZI, Commissioner

Social Security Administration1

DEFENDANT

ORDER

Before the Court is Plaintiff Jessica Belmudes’s Motion for Attorney’s Fees Pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act (“EAJA”). Doc. 23. The Commissioner has not objected or otherwise responded to the Motion, and the time to do so has passed.

Plaintiff’s attorney, Stephanie Bartels Wallace, requests a total award of $6,750.32 (which sum includes 30.25 attorney hours incurred in 2020–21 at an hourly rate of $206; 6.65 paralegal hours at an hourly rate of $75; and expenses of $20.07).

The Court concludes that Plaintiff is entitled to an award of attorney’s fees under the EAJA and that the requested sum is reasonable.

1 On July 9, 2021, Kilolo Kijakazi became the Acting Commissioner of the Social Security Administration and is substituted as the Defendant in this action. Fed. R. Civ. P. 25(d).

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion for Attorney’s Fees pursuant to the EAJA (Doc. 23) is GRANTED.

Plaintiff is awarded $6,750.32 in fees and expenses under the EAJA.?

SO ORDERED, this 19th day of July, 2021. am STATES MAGISFRATE JUDGE ? Consistent with the Commissioner’s usual procedure in light of Astrue v. Ratliff, 560 U.S. 586 (2010), the check awarding EAJA fees should be made payable to Plaintiff but mailed to the Plaintiff in care of Plaintiffs attorney at the attorney’s office.

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.