Stancil v. Social Security Administration
Stancil v. Social Security Administration
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS CENTRAL DIVISION
JONATHAN DANIEL STANCIL PLAINTIFF
V. CASE NO. 4:20-CV-1144-JTR
KILOLO KIJAKAZI, Commissioner Social Security Administration1 DEFENDANT
ORDER Plaintiff, Jonathan Daniel Stancil, seeks judicial review of the administrative denial of his claims for disability insurance benefits. Doc. 2. The Commissioner has filed an Unopposed Motion to Reverse and Remand for further administrative proceedings, pursuant to the fourth sentence of
42 U.S.C. § 405(g). Doc. 19. The Motion states that Stancil’s counsel does not oppose the requested reversal and remand.
Id. at 1. Under the circumstances, remand is appropriate. Accordingly, the Commissioner’s Unopposed Motion to Reverse and Remand, Doc. 19, is GRANTED. The Commissioner’s prior decision is REVERSED, and this matter is REMANDED for further administrative proceedings and issuance of a new decision. This is a “sentence four” remand within the meaning of
42 U.S.C. § 405(g) and Melkonyan v. Sullivan,
501 U.S. 89(1991).
1 On July 9, 2021, Kilolo Kijakazi became the Acting Commissioner of the Social Security Administration and is substituted as the Defendant in this action. Fed. R. Civ. P. 25(d). SO ORDERED, this 26th day of July, 2021.
mm acai JUDGE
Reference
- Status
- Unknown