Johnson v. Social Security Administration

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS CENTRAL DIVISION TIMOTHY J. JOHNSON PLAINTIFF V. NO. 4:20CV00743 BRW-JTK COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION DEFENDANT ORDER I have reviewed the Recommended Disposition submitted by United States Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney. No objections have been filed. After careful consideration, I approve and adopt the Recommended Disposition in all respects.

Accordingly, this case is REMANDED pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) and Melkonyan v. Sullivan, 501 U.S. 89 (1991).

IT IS SO ORDERED, this 2nd day of August, 2021.

Billy Roy Wilson_________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS CENTRAL DIVISION TIMOTHY J. JOHNSON PLAINTIFF V. NO. 4:20CV00743 BRW-JTK COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION DEFENDANT ORDER The Court has reviewed the Recommended Disposition submitted by United States Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney and the filed objections. After careful consideration, the Court concludes that the Recommended Disposition should be, and hereby is, approved and adopted in its entirety as this Court=s findings in all respects. Judgment will be entered accordingly.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT this case is REMANDED pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) and Melkonyan v. Sullivan, 501 U.S. 89 (1991).

DATED this _____ day of __________, 2021.

_______________________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS CENTRAL DIVISION TIMOTHY J. JOHNSON PLAINTIFF V. NO. 4:20CV00743 BRW-JTK COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION DEFENDANT JUDGMENT Consistent with the Order that was entered on this day, it is CONSIDERED, ORDERED, and ADJUDGED that judgment be entered for the Plaintiff, reversing the decision of the Commissioner, and remanding this case for further proceedings pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) and Melkonyan v. Sullivan, 501 U.S. 89 (1991).

DATED this _____ day of __________, 2021.

________________________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE