Williamson v. Wright
Trial Court Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
CENTRAL DIVISION
CORY WILLIAMSON PLAINTIFF v. No: 4:21-cv-00568-JM
RODNEY WRIGHT, et al. DEFENDANTS ORDER
Plaintiff Cory Williamson filed a pro se complaint, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, on June 24, 2021 (Doc. No. 1). On June 25, 2021, the Court entered an order directing Williamson to submit the full $402.00 filing and administrative fees or file a fully completed in forma pauperis application within 30 days. See Doc. No. 2. Williamson was cautioned that failure to comply with the Court’s order within that time would result in the dismissal of his case.
More than 30 days have passed, and Williamson has not complied or otherwise responded to the June 25 order. Accordingly, the Court finds that this action should be dismissed without prejudice for failure to comply with Local Rule 5.5(c)(2) and failure to respond to the Court’s orders. See Miller v. Benson, 51 F.3d 166, 168 (8th Cir. 1995) (District courts have inherent power to dismiss sua sponte a case for failure to prosecute, and exercise of that power is reviewed for abuse of discretion).
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT Williamson’s complaint (Doc. No. 1) 1s DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.
DATED this 5" day of August, 2021.
Glma
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.